成唯識論述記 7.45

7.45

述曰：此顯正義，各有別體，與餘思等行相別故，如貪等法各別有體，惡作悔性等，餘法所無故。《瑜伽論》言：世俗有者，以說是癡分，隨癡相說名世俗有，如惛沈等名癡分者，義如前說。

The Commentary states: This demonstrates the correct doctrine: each has a separate substantial reality, because their mental aspects (ākāra) are distinct from other factors such as volition, just as factors like greed separately have their own substantial reality; the remorseful nature of remorse, etc., is absent in other factors. When Yogācārabhūmi states that they are 'conventionally existent', it is because they are spoken of as portions of delusion, and following the marks of delusion they are called conventionally existent, just as torpor and the like are called portions of delusion, the meaning of which is as explained before.