成唯識論述記 7.61

7.61

述曰：由此理故，一二之言，顯二種二。此二二者，如文可知。何以為二二者？以此二種類各別故。云何各別？一、繫界種類別；二、依思、惠種類別；三假、實種類別；四、斷時種類別；五、上地起、不起種類別；六、支、非支種類別故；七、纏、蓋性種類別；八、語行、非行別；九、通定、散門別；十、通無漏類別。由此二二別，以一二言，顯二種二。此即解頌中初一「二」字訖。第二二者。

The Commentary states: By virtue of this reasoning, the single word "two" indicates two kinds of pairs. These two pairs may be understood as the text explains. Why are they made into two pairs? Because the categories of these two are distinct from each other. How are they distinct? First, the distinction in categories of bound realms; second, the distinction in categories of relying upon volition (cetanā) or discernment (prajñā); third, the distinction in categories of provisional or real; fourth, the distinction in categories of the time of abandoning; fifth, the distinction in categories of arising or not arising in higher stages; sixth, the distinction in categories of factors [of dhyāna] or non-factors; seventh, the distinction in categories of the natures of entanglements (paryavasthāna) or hindrances (nīvaraṇa); eighth, the distinction of verbal action or non-action; ninth, the distinction in gates of engaging meditative concentration or distraction; tenth, the distinction in categories of engaging the untainted. Because of these distinctions between the two pairs, the single word "two" indicates two kinds of pairs. This concludes the explanation of the first word "two" in the verse. As for the second "two":