成唯識論述記 8.364

8.364

述曰：二、釋妨難，於中有五：一、會集論，若五所引，二為能引，何故《集論》名識能引？三、四有異。《集論》說識亦能引者，亦前二支為第三故，遂致「亦」言。識中業種名識支故，種子識中通有行識，故說行種以為識支，是能引攝。若爾，識種何法所攝？

The Commentary states: Second, resolving difficulties, wherein there are five: First, harmonizing with the Samuccaya. If five are induced and two are the inducing, why does the Samuccaya call consciousness inducing? Three and four differ. When the Samuccaya says consciousness is 'also' inducing, it is because it serves as the third along with the preceding two branches; hence it introduces the word 'also'. Because karma seeds within consciousness are named the branch of consciousness, and within the seed-consciousness karmic consciousness is universally present, the karma seed is spoken of as the branch of consciousness, which is subsumed under the inducing. If so, under what dharma is the seed of consciousness subsumed?