成唯識論述記 8.368

8.368

述曰：二會契經。問：《集論》可爾，《緣起經》上卷說此識支通能、所引，此如何通？彼經說通能、所引者，業種、識種俱名識故，各別義說，非定相違。何故識種不同《集論》名色所攝？

The Commentary states: Second, harmonizing with the sūtras. Question: The Samuccaya may be so, but the first fascicle of the Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra says that this branch of consciousness pertains to both the inducing and the induced; how is this harmonized? That sūtra says it pertains to both inducing and induced because both the karma seed and the consciousness seed are called consciousness; they are explained with distinct meanings and are not strictly contradictory. Why is the consciousness seed not subsumed under name-and-form as in the Samuccaya?