成唯識論述記 8.428

8.428

述曰：此隨他答。非為盡理，何謂為定？不求無後有，依勝善行，生善趣者，定有愛故，謂唯除彼求無後有及生惡趣已外，定有愛生，求無有故，不希有起愛，生惡趣故，不愛所生處。除此已外，愛是定有。問：若爾，不還果現無愛潤，聖教所說，言定有愛，豈不相違？

The Commentary states: This is an answer following the opponent's view; it does not fully exhaust the principle. What is meant by definite? Because for those who do not seek the cessation of subsequent existence and, relying on superior wholesome actions, are born into good destinies, craving is definitely present. That is to say, only excluding those who seek the cessation of subsequent existence and those born into miserable destinies, craving definitely arises: seeking non-existence, they do not desire existence and produce craving; being born into miserable destinies, they do not crave the place of birth. Aside from these, craving is definitely present. Question: If so, a non-returner does not manifestly moisten rebirth with craving; does this not contradict the sacred teaching which says craving is definitely present?