成唯識論述記 9.111

9.111

述曰：下破斥中，有五過難，此為第一。若諸相分非依他者，佛等無漏後得智品所變二分應名所執，應立量云：有漏非染見、相二分，非計所執，是非染心現二分故，如無漏心現二分等。

The Commentary states: Below, in the refutation, there are five faulty consequences; this is the first. If the nimitta-bhāgas were not other-dependent, the two parts transformed by the untainted pṛṣṭhalabdha-jñāna and its associates of the Buddhas and others would have to be called the imagined. One should formulate the inference: 'The sāsrava, non-defiled darśana- and nimitta-bhāgas are not the imagined nature; because they are two parts manifested by non-defiled minds; just like the two parts manifested by an anāsrava mind.'