成唯識論述記 9.113

9.113

述曰：若許無漏見、相二分如二乘等亦計所執，則應聖智不緣自依他相分等生；若緣相生便計所執，能緣依他所有智品應非道諦，有相分故，如有漏心。若不許聖智雖有二分非計所執，應知有漏心亦應爾有二分故，如無漏心。

The Commentary states: If you accept that the untainted darśana- and nimitta-bhāgas, like those of the two vehicles and so forth, are also the imagined nature, then noble wisdom should not arise taking its own other-dependent nimitta-bhāgas and so forth as cognitive objects; if it took nimittas as cognitive objects and arose, it would be the imagined, and all the cognitive categories able to apprehend the other-dependent would not be the Truth of the Path, because they have a nimitta-bhāga, just like a sāsrava mind. If you do not accept that noble wisdom, although having two parts, is the imagined nature, one should know that a sāsrava mind should likewise be so, because it has two parts, just like the anāsrava mind.