成唯識論述記 9.191

9.191

述曰：下諸門釋，於中有二：初以十一門辨；後總指例。今別問答故，成十一。於中，子細諸門極多，此為第一。論中問意，如無漏有為具二義故，依他、圓成二性所攝。此擇滅等，等取不動、想受滅等，有言無漏收，有論亦言苦諦等攝。此於三性，何性攝耶？

The Commentary states: The following explanations through various approaches are divided into two parts: first, distinguishing them by eleven approaches; second, a general summary by analogy. Now, distinguishing them by question and answer yields eleven. Within these, subtle and detailed approaches are extremely numerous, and this is the first. The intention of the question in the treatise is this: because conditioned anāsrava dharmas possess two meanings, they are subsumed under the two natures of paratantra and pariniṣpanna. These [unconditioned dharmas such as] pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha and so forth—"and so forth" includes the unmoving, the cessation of ideation and feeling, and the like—are stated by some texts to be included under anāsrava, while some treatises also state that they are subsumed under duḥkha-satya and so forth. Under which of the three natures are they subsumed?