成唯識論述記 9.195

9.195

述曰：如論可知，即顯諸論言無漏者，無漏心變；言苦諦等攝者，有漏心變，亦不相違既言苦等。心所變者，依他起攝，此唯定也，不多執空而感生死，略不說集，理亦集攝。不善心執，如勝論等，此說多分，故苦諦收。為顯此義，因述上來所說依他義亦不定，故次論云。

The Commentary states: As the treatise can be known, this reveals that when treatises speak of anāsrava, it refers to the transformations of an anāsrava citta; when they speak of subsumption under duḥkha-satya and so forth, it refers to the transformations of a sāsrava citta; thus there is no contradiction. Since it speaks of duḥkha and so forth, what is transformed by citta is subsumed under paratantra, and this is exclusively definite. Because one does not frequently cling to space and thereby induce saṃsāra, samudaya is briefly omitted; in principle it is also subsumed under samudaya. Clung to by unwholesome minds, as in the case of the Vaiśeṣikas and others, this speaks of the majority, hence it is included under duḥkha-satya. In order to make this meaning evident, by way of reviewing what was explained above, the meaning of paratantra is also not fixed, and so the treatise next states: