成唯識論述記 9.21

9.21

述曰：次第四句。如是第三句遍計所執自性都無所有，非少可有故名都無。依他性法少可有故，何以知無？理、教二法，子細推徵不可得故，如前第七卷等所引理、教。此即一翻，但解初性。

The Commentary states: Next is the fourth line. Such own-nature of pervasive conceptualization in the third line is utterly non-existent; because it does not exist even in the slightest, it is called "utterly non-existent." Phenomena of dependent nature exist in some slight measure. How is it known to be non-existent? Because when thoroughly investigated through the two dharmas of reason and teaching, it cannot be apprehended, as in the reason and teachings cited previously in fascicle seven and elsewhere. This is one round, merely explaining the first nature.