成唯識論述記 9.211

9.211

述曰：《中邊》云：此三，二性攝，所以者何？若妄所執三，皆遍計所執攝；若約詮雜染三，皆依他收。遍計執心唯染依他故，三如之相染依他故，三如之相體雜染攝，非圓成實。

The Commentary states: The Madhyāntavibhāga says: these three are subsumed under two natures. Why is this? If they are the three falsely clung to, they are all subsumed under parikalpita; if they are the three defilements in terms of designation, they are all included under paratantra. Because the falsely grasping mind is solely defiled paratantra, the marks of the three tathatās are defiled paratantra, and thus the essences of the marks of the three tathatās are subsumed under defilement, not under pariniṣpanna.