成唯識論述記 9.213

9.213

述曰：亦約詮無漏故，《中邊》云：此唯聖境，聖智所顯故。問：何故唯識非前二性，正行一種不通依他？答：遍計所執多不執唯識，依他起性少能知唯識，故非前二攝。正行約離過義，不言通依他。據實而言，前通前二性；此後通依他，亦無過失。又七皆三性，於理不違，所執、心變、如體異故，論中既約隨相而言，亦無過失。

The Commentary states: This is also because they are anāsrava in terms of designation. The Madhyāntavibhāga says: these are exclusively the domain of the noble, because they are revealed by noble wisdom. Question: Why is consciousness-only not the former two natures, and right conduct alone does not extend to paratantra? Answer: Parikalpita-svabhāva for the most part does not cling to consciousness-only, and paratantra-svabhāva rarely is able to know consciousness-only; therefore they are not subsumed under the former two. Right conduct is spoken in terms of freedom from faults, so it is not said to extend to paratantra. Speaking according to the truth, the former extends to the first two natures, and the latter extends to paratantra, without any flaw. Furthermore, all seven can pertain to the three natures without contradicting principle, because the object clung to, the transformation of citta, and the essence of tathatā differ. Since the treatise speaks according to their marks, there is no error.