成唯識論述記 9.233

9.233

述曰：餘文可知。唯遍計所執相、名二事者，即隨能計依他之心，假立所執而為相、名，由多依名而計於義，依義計名，體實都無，實非名、相。七十六說：初所執性依於相、名，文同於此。二成實攝，正與前同，故論不釋。

The Commentary states: The rest of the text can be understood [from this]. As for stating that the parikalpita-svabhāva consists solely of the two factors, marks and names: depending on the paratantra consciousness which is capable of conceiving, what is conceived is provisionally designated as marks and names; because one mostly conceives of objects based on names and conceives of names based on objects, whereas substantially their substance is entirely non-existent, and so they are not truly names and marks. Fascicle seventy-six states that the first [nature], the parikalpita-svabhāva, relies on marks and names, which agrees in text with this. The second [statement], that the pariniṣpanna subsumes [them], is identical to the preceding, and therefore the treatise does not explain it.