成唯識論述記 9.275

9.275

述曰：一、自性滅，滅者，不生義故，性實假名為滅，定非諦攝。二、二取滅，能、所取無故，護法、安惠各有別解，從所無得滅依他，假名滅，諦實，非依他故性假。《中邊》云：二取不生。三、本性滅，《中邊》云：謂擇滅及真如，與此相違。如彼抄會，如次配三性。

The Commentary states: First, cessation of self-nature: cessation means non-arising; its nature is real, but it is nominally designated as cessation, and is definitely not subsumed under the truth. Second, cessation of the two graspings: because the grasper and the grasped are absent. Dharmapāla and Sthiramati have distinct explanations; obtaining the cessation of the other-dependent from what is absent, it is nominally designated as cessation; its status as a truth is real, but because it is not other-dependent, its nature is metaphorical. The Madhyāntavibhāga says: non-arising of the two graspings. Third, cessation of original nature: the Madhyāntavibhāga says: it refers to analytical cessation (pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha) and tathatā, which contrasts with this. As reconciled in that commentary, these correspond in order to the three natures.