成唯識論述記 9.600

9.600

述曰：此下第三總釋，於中有三：一、會違；二、釋頌不說；三、智攝。今初也。依真之義假說相見道等為無間等，如前引《顯揚》十七，正與此同。此有三因，三心相見道真非安立後生故，餘如文可解，然非安立因不遍三心相見道義。

The Commentary states: From here downward is the third general explanation, which contains three parts: first, reconciling discrepancies; second, explaining why the verse does not mention it; third, subsumption under wisdom. This is the first. Based on the meaning of the real, the figurative path of seeing and so forth are conventionally termed uninterrupted and so on, exactly identical to the passage from Prakaraṇāryavācā fascicle 17 cited earlier. This has three reasons: because the three-mind figurative path of seeing is produced after the real non-posited [path of seeing], and the rest can be understood from the text. However, the reason 'non-posited' does not universally apply to the meaning of the three-mind figurative path of seeing.