成唯識論掌中樞要 2.257

2.257

何故餘地障皆有二愚，唯第四地障不即二愚？異生既不斷麁重，云何二靜慮斷苦根麁重，二乘亦如是？今解：凡夫小伏現行麁重，二乘亦能分滅定障小分種子、苦根麁重，亦得何妨。如理應思。

Why is it that the obstacles of the other bhūmis all possess two ignorances, whereas only the obstacle of the fourth bhūmi is not identical to the two ignorances? Since ordinary worldlings do not sever coarseness/heaviness (dauṣṭhulya), how do the two dhyānas sever the coarseness/heaviness of the faculty of suffering (duḥkhendriya), and how is it likewise for the two vehicles? The present explanation is: worldlings slightly subdue active coarseness/heaviness, and the two vehicles are also able to partially extinguish a minor part of the seeds of the obstacle of concentration and the coarseness/heaviness of the faculty of suffering; what objection could there be to their doing so as well? One should reflect properly on this.