成唯識論了義燈 2.82

2.82

六、假實不分失者。以引《雜集》第七云：後二故思若作若增，必受異熟者。是說業道種實感異熟能，非無表色。若業道功能與無表不別者，無表如業應行蘊攝，攝處既別，明假實殊，今引實能難假功能者，即假實不分失。

Sixth is the fault of failing to distinguish between the provisional and the real. By citing the seventh fascicle of the Samuccaya, which says: 'If the latter two intentional volitions are performed or accumulated, one must definitely experience their maturation'—this speaks of the real capacity of the seeds of the courses of karma to induce maturation, not of avijñapti-rūpa. If the functional capacity of the courses of karma were not distinct from avijñapti, avijñapti, like karma, would be subsumed under the saṃskāra-skandha. Since the categories of inclusion are distinct, it is clear that the provisional and the real are different. Now, citing a real capacity to refute a provisional functional capacity is precisely the fault of failing to distinguish between the provisional and the real.