成唯識論了義燈 3.8

3.8

《論》：表此後無為相何失？本疏云：即現在法，於後無時，名之為滅，假言過去，過去體無，實非彼世。

Regarding the treatise's statement, "What fault is there in having it indicate the subsequent non-existence of this as its characteristic?": The original commentary says: It is precisely the present dharma, at the subsequent time of its non-existence, that is designated as 'cessation'; conventionally spoken of as past, the past has no substantial substance, and is not really that time-period.