成唯識論了義燈 4.73

4.73

次下雙破「結生染識非行感」故。彼此宗計，唯無記法，為業所感。彼兩宗計，結生之識，與愛恚俱，染非業感故。無性云：又結生心，非無記故，愛恚俱故。既非無記，以行為緣，不應道理。薩婆多救如本疏辨，本經部救同薩婆多：以生位色為業熏感。同有部破。

Next below, it refutes both schools because 'the defiled consciousness of conception is not induced by volitional action'. According to the tenets of both schools, only indeterminate dharmas are induced by karma. Both schools hold that the consciousness of conception is accompanied by attachment and anger; being defiled, it is not induced by karma. Therefore Asvalakṣaṇa says: 'Furthermore, the mind of conception is not indeterminate, because it is accompanied by attachment and anger. Since it is not indeterminate, taking volitional action as its condition is unreasonable.' The Sarvāstivādin rescue is as explained in the original commentary; the original Sautrāntika rescue is the same as the Sarvāstivādin: they take the rūpa at the stage of birth to be perfumed and induced by karma. This is refuted in the same manner as the Sarvāstivādins.