成唯識論了義燈 5.195

5.195

《論》：尋、伺與識俱不俱門。本《疏》云：自性有二：一、尋、伺為體，即《雜集論》第二所說自性分別，即七分別中有相分別；二、非尋、伺為體，即此《論》第五，及《攝論》第一，許五識有自性分別，但不許有隨念、計度二分別故。

Regarding the section in the treatise on whether gross investigation and subtle investigation are associated or unassociated with consciousness: The basic Commentary says: There are two kinds of essential nature: First, having gross investigation and subtle investigation as substance, which is the conceptualization of essential nature (svabhāva-vikalpa) explained in the second fascicle of the Samuccaya, namely the conceptualization with characteristics (sanimitta-vikalpa) among the seven conceptualizations. Second, not having gross investigation and subtle investigation as substance, which refers to the fifth fascicle of this treatise and the first fascicle of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, which grant that the five consciousnesses possess conceptualization of essential nature, but do not grant that they possess the two conceptualizations of recollection (anusmaraṇa-vikalpa) and calculation (vikalpanā-vikalpa).