成唯識論了義燈 5.218

5.218

答：准《瑜伽》第五云：若尋、伺皆分別，有分別非尋伺，准此二句，只言尋、伺必是七分別，不言七分別，皆定是尋、伺。不爾者為如是句？答：由有分別，非皆尋、伺。《攝論》、《唯識》，許自性一通六識有。《雜集論》許任運分別即五識身，不爾相違。

Answer: According to the fifth [fascicle] of the Yogācārabhūmi, it says: 'If all vitarka and vicāra are vikalpa, there are vikalpas that are not vitarka and vicāra.' According to these two lines, it only says that vitarka and vicāra must be [included among] the seven discriminations; it does not say that the seven discriminations must all definitely be vitarka and vicāra. If it were not so, what would such a phrase mean? Answer: Because there are discriminations that are not all vitarka and vicāra. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha and Vijñapti-mātra accept that the single intrinsic-nature [discrimination] extends to all six consciousnesses. The Abhidharmasamuccaya accepts that spontaneous discrimination is simply the collection of the five consciousnesses. If it were not so, they would contradict each other.