成唯識論了義燈 5.64

5.64

問：根本六或及二十隨，但翻十一為善十一，餘之十五何故不翻？答：西明釋云：所以不翻者，一為不定屬一善故；二為或屬純淨善，或入雜類善。今謂不爾。且忿、恨等定屬無嗔，入純淨善非在雜類。但應如《論》：一、相用有別；二、遍六識；三、障勝因，以彼忿等無別相用，不遍六識非障勝因故，不別翻立為善教。如不放逸對治放逸，由不放逸成滿一切世出世善，防惡修善。以此勝故，差別立之，餘不立者，應准此知。

Question: Among the six fundamental defilements and the twenty secondary defilements, only eleven are inverted to become the eleven wholesome factors; why are the remaining fifteen not inverted? Answer: The master of Ximing explains: As to why they are not inverted, first, it is because they do not determinately belong to a single wholesome factor; second, it is because they either belong to purely wholesome factors or enter into miscellaneous categories of wholesome factors. Now I say this is not so. Anger, hatred, and the like determinately belong to non-hatred and enter into the purely wholesome, not being in miscellaneous categories. Rather, it should be as the treatise states: first, they have distinct characteristics and functions; second, they pervade the six consciousnesses; third, they obstruct supreme causes. Because those factors such as anger lack distinct characteristics and functions, do not pervade the six consciousnesses, and do not obstruct supreme causes, they are not separately inverted and established as wholesome doctrines. For example, diligence counteracts negligence; by diligence, all mundane and supramundane wholesome factors are brought to fulfillment, preventing evil and cultivating good. Because of this superiority, it is distinctively established. That the others are not established should be understood according to this.