成唯識論了義燈 7.211

7.211

《論》：「由斯，初地說斷二愚」等。問：何故障中但言異生性，不攝第二愚；第二地中斷邪行障，即并攝第二？答：彼邪行障以竪論故，通果即寬，橫論即狹，不遍煩惱。異生性障橫論故寬，遍二障故；竪言即狹，不攝第二愚。據橫、竪別，故不相違。又解：邪行障寬，故攝二愚；異生性狹，不攝第二。何緣如是？障聖性增唯異生性，障勝戒故，起業亦是。又依第二解，利、鈍品愚異生性障亦攝二愚。又《論》云「雖見道生」等，本疏云能起煩惱亦攝所知。《要集》云：「『煩惱』言不攝所知，望業果勢疎遠故」。今謂：不爾，通二障故。准下，所知亦「煩惱」言攝故。

The Śāstra says: "Due to this, the first stage is said to abandon two delusions," etc. Question: Why is it that among the obstructions it only mentions the obstruction of being an ordinary being and does not subsume the second delusion, whereas in the second stage, abandoning the obstruction of wrong conduct subsumes both along with the second? Answer: Because that obstruction of wrong conduct is discussed vertically, its pervading the result is broad, but discussed horizontally it is narrow and does not pervade the afflictions. The obstruction of being an ordinary being is discussed horizontally and is therefore broad, pervading both obstructions; vertically speaking it is narrow, not subsuming the second delusion. Being based on the difference between horizontal and vertical, they do not conflict. Another explanation says: The obstruction of wrong conduct is broad and therefore subsumes the two delusions; being an ordinary being is narrow and does not subsume the second. For what reason is it like this? That which obstructs the increase of the noble nature is exclusively being an ordinary being; because it obstructs superior discipline, giving rise to actions is also this. Furthermore, according to the second explanation, regarding the sharp and dull grades of delusion, the obstruction of being an ordinary being also subsumes the two delusions. Furthermore, the Śāstra says "Although born in the path of seeing," etc.; the original commentary says that being able to give rise to afflictions also subsumes the cognitive [obstruction]. The Yaoji says: "The word 'affliction' does not subsume the cognitive [obstruction], because looking toward the power of karmic results it is distant." We now say: This is not so, because it applies to both obstructions. According to what follows, the cognitive [obstruction] is also subsumed under the term 'affliction.'