成唯識論了義燈 7.280

7.280

論：二、所棄捨等者，本釋如《疏》。西明二解：「一云：但捨二乘無漏，對菩薩故，名劣無漏；二云：二乘無漏及菩薩因位未圓無漏，亦名為劣。」三藏意取初說為正，餘及《要集》皆同有釋。今謂：不唯二乘名劣，菩薩因位亦劣所收。若不名劣，因果何別？何故《論》云金剛喻定引極圓明純淨本識？又第二師云：住無間道應名佛故，後解脫道應無用故。由此故知，因位無漏亦名為劣。不爾，《論》文應有簡別，漸悟菩薩捨劣無漏，頓悟菩薩無劣無漏故。又因不捨，豈得成佛不捨金剛喻定無間道耶？又《雜集》第十四云「於諸現觀位證得後後勝品道時，捨前所得下劣品道」，故知得佛捨劣因位，言捨之者，非是全捨，但是轉齊。又二乘者即是轉滅，二俱名捨。

Treatise: "Second, what is abandoned," etc.: The original explanation is as in the Commentary. Ximing gives two explanations: "First: Only the anāsrava of the two vehicles is abandoned; because it is contrasted with the bodhisattva, it is called inferior anāsrava. Second: The anāsrava of the two vehicles and the unperfected anāsrava of the bodhisattva's causal stage are both called inferior." The Tripiṭaka Master intended to take the first explanation as correct, and other works as well as the Yaoji share this explanation. Now I say: Not only the two vehicles are called inferior; the bodhisattva's causal stage is also included in the inferior. If it were not called inferior, what difference would there be between cause and fruit? Why does the treatise state that the vajropamasamādhi induces the extremely perfect, luminous, and purely undefiled basic consciousness? Furthermore, the second master says: "Because abiding in the ānantaryamārga one would have to be called a Buddha, the subsequent vimuktimārga would be useless." Hence, one knows from this that the anāsrava of the causal stage is also called inferior. Otherwise, the text of the treatise should make a distinction: gradually enlightened bodhisattvas abandon the inferior anāsrava, whereas suddenly enlightened bodhisattvas have no inferior anāsrava. Furthermore, if the cause is not abandoned, how could one attain Buddhahood without abandoning the ānantaryamārga of the vajropamasamādhi? Moreover, the Abhidharmasamuccaya, fascicle fourteen, states: "When attaining the successively superior paths in the stages of direct realization, one abandons the previously attained inferior paths." Therefore, one knows that attaining Buddhahood abandons the inferior causal stages; stating that they are abandoned does not mean total abandonment, but merely transformation-equalization. Furthermore, for the two vehicles, it is transformation-extinction; both are called abandonment.