成唯識論了義燈 7.57

7.57

《論》：「法空智品與俱起故」，此破安惠。然《疏》云「第七有法執，法空智起即不行；第八法執有，法空智起此應滅」者，是破餘師，非安惠師。或寫者誤。若破安惠，應云：第七有我執，生空智起即不行；第八法執有，法空智起此應滅。

The Treatise says: "Because it arises concurrently with the category of dharma-emptiness wisdom." This refutes Sthiramati. However, the commentary says: "The seventh [consciousness] has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, it immediately ceases to function; the eighth has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, this ought to be eradicated." This refutes other masters, not Master Sthiramati. Or it is a scribal error. If refuting Sthiramati, it should say: "The seventh has self-grasping, and when person-emptiness wisdom arises, it immediately ceases to function; the eighth has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, this ought to be eradicated."