成唯識論演祕 1.150

1.150

詳曰：據相顯言少有其理。若以實論，三文皆通真、俗二智，故第三云：令於唯識深妙理中得如實解，豈深妙理唯是識相，非識真理？又知識相名如實智，亦何爽理？故皆通二智。

I examine [this] as follows: according to the explicit statements of the aspects, there is a little reason to this. But if spoken of in reality, all three passages apply to both the ultimate and conventional wisdoms. Thus the third says: 'to cause one to obtain an understanding in accordance with reality in the profound and wondrous principle of vijñapti-mātra'—how could the profound and wondrous principle be only the marks of consciousness and not the true principle of consciousness? Moreover, how would knowing the marks of consciousness being called wisdom in accordance with reality violate logic? Therefore, they all apply to both wisdoms.