成唯識論演祕 1.473

1.473

詳曰：設取我外為無為義為喻亦得，餘有無為等，有不可說義。有、無為等而不在彼我、非我聚，我上既有不可說義，云何即在我、非我攝？喻有二立，可為正喻。

I examine: Even if one takes the meaning of conditioned and unconditioned outside the self as the example, it also works. Other conditioned, unconditioned, and the like possess the inexpressible meaning. The conditioned, unconditioned, and the like are not in that collection of self and non-self; since the self already possesses the inexpressible meaning, how could it be subsumed under self and non-self? The example has both establishments and can serve as a valid example.