成唯識論演祕 1.476
成唯識論演祕 1.476
- Language
- Classical Chinese
1.476
若爾，何故論云：又既不可說有為、無為，豈餘有為等不可說作為、無為耶？
If so, why does the Treatise say: “Furthermore, since it cannot be spoken of as either conditioned or unconditioned…”? Could other conditioned things and the like not be spoken of as conditioned or unconditioned?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation