成唯識論演祕 1.492

1.492

答：應說我云，我見有二：一、執著我見；二、雖緣我而不執著。初染，後淨。言無我見得涅槃者，據無染見，下立量破，破染我見故無相扶。二云：諸宗計我皆我見緣，故後二量無相扶失，而言非我見緣者，是設遮也。

Answer: One should explain the self by saying that the view of a self has two types: first, the view of a self that grasps and clings; second, that which cognizes the self without clinging. The first is defiled, and the second is pure. The statement that one who lacks the view of a self attains nirvāṇa is based on lacking the defiled view; the inference established below refutes the defiled view of a self, so there is no proving of what is already established. The second [explanation] says: All the [non-Buddhist] schools claim that the self is an object of the view of a self, so the latter two inferences have no fallacy of proving what is already established; as for saying “it is not an object cognized by the view of a self”, that is a hypothetical exclusion.