成唯識論演祕 1.55

1.55

詳曰：本為標彼造釋論者，世親不是，所以不言，何關文略義缺不標。又現所題雖釋論稱，標彼本頌亦復題云《成唯識論》，言「成唯識」唯釋論稱，亦少虧甄簡。

Examination: It originally intended to indicate the author of the commentary; since Vasubandhu was not, he is not mentioned. What does that have to do with brief wording and incomplete meaning? Furthermore, although the present title belongs to the commentary, the root verses are also entitled Cheng weishi lun; saying that "Cheng weishi" belongs exclusively to the commentary also slightly fails in precise discrimination.