成唯識論演祕 1.608

1.608

此准疏文但有五量；返覆作者，合有八量，勒為四對。第二對中疏文具二；餘之三對，疏但一量，示方隅爾。一、總法即別破：《疏》大等總法至為難亦爾。二、總相即體破：《疏》又微三事至如總相，文中具有覆逆二量。三、總相非一破：《疏》三事總相至如本三事。四、別相三破：《疏》三事別相至如大等，返例可知。有云：三對有六量者，理不盡也。

Following the text of the Commentary, there are only five syllogisms (pramāṇa); but formulated back and forth, there are altogether eight syllogisms, condensed into four pairs. In the second pair, the Commentary's text provides both; in the other three pairs, the Commentary gives only one syllogism merely to indicate the direction. First, the refutation that the aggregate phenomenon is identical to the distinct ones: The Commentary states from 'The aggregate phenomenon such as the mahat…' to 'the objection is also like this.' Second, the refutation that the aggregate aspect is identical to the entity: The Commentary states 'Furthermore, the three subtle things… like the aggregate aspect'; the text contains both the direct and reverse syllogisms. Third, the refutation that the aggregate aspect is not one: The Commentary states 'The aggregate aspect of the three things… like the original three things.' Fourth, the refutation that the distinct aspects are three: The Commentary states 'The distinct aspects of the three things… like the mahat and so forth'; the reverse case can be understood by analogy. Some say there are six syllogisms in three pairs, but that reasoning is not exhaustive.