成唯識論演祕 1.648

1.648

答：雖不明言理實定有，故彼論云：俱分云何謂實性？一切實和合於一一實，實詮緣因；德、業亦爾，釋即總俱分。彼云：及彼一義和合地性、色性、取性，釋如次，即是實、德、業，三別俱分義，由此疏、《開善》得彼旨。

Answer: Although not explicitly stated, in principle it definitely exists. Thus that treatise says: 'What is sāmānya-viśeṣa? It refers to substance-ness. Inherent in all substances, it is the cause for the verbal expression and cognition of substance in each individual substance; quality and motion are also like this'—this explanation is general sāmānya-viśeṣa. It says: 'And inhering in a single referent as earth-ness, form-ness, action-ness'—this explanation, in proper order, refers to the specific sāmānya-viśeṣa of the three: substance, quality, and motion. Through this, the Commentary and Kaishan grasped its intent.