成唯識論演祕 1.698

1.698

詳曰：疏既說云「子微已上」，明知不說「子微為現」。下破順世明多果合以為其境，不證子微是現境也，具如《義燈》。

Critique: Since the Commentary states "from offspring atoms on up," one clearly knows it does not mean that "offspring atoms are direct perception." Below, when refuting the Cārvāka, it explains that the aggregate of multiple effects constitutes their object; it does not prove that offspring atoms are objects of direct perception, exactly as detailed in the Yideng.