成唯識論演祕 1.847

1.847

詳曰：今觀論勢前為本計亦復何爽？故前論云，又所生果不越因量，此牒而破。若非本計，論牒於誰？故前本計，此為轉敘，亦應無失。

Detailed assessment: Now, examining the momentum of the treatise, what flaw is there in taking the earlier statement as the original position? Therefore, the earlier treatise states, 'Furthermore, the produced result does not exceed the dimension of its cause,' which it takes up and refutes. If it were not the original position, whose view would the treatise be taking up? Therefore, the earlier is the original position, and this is a shifting reformulation, which should also be faultless.