成唯識論演祕 1.884

1.884

詳曰：若同外計一句亦非，若依假詮通有四句而有何失？更互相望得成四句，如前應悉。

I examine [this and suggest]: If it were like the non-Buddhist theories, not even a single position would be correct. If one relies on conventional designations, what fault is there in accommodating all four positions? Relative to one another, the four positions are established, as should be understood from what was said earlier.