成唯識論演祕 2.21

2.21

答：取謂照矚，緣謂緣慮，故二別也。又《俱舍論》句數聊簡云：若法境界有對亦障礙有對耶？應作四句：謂七心界、法界一分諸相應法，是第一句；色等五境，是第二句；眼等五根，是第三句；法界一分非相應法，是第四句。若法境界有對亦所緣有對耶？應順後句答，謂若所緣有對定是境界有對；有雖境界有對而非所緣有對，謂眼等五根。

Answer: Apprehending means illuminating; cognizing means reflective consideration; hence the two are different. Furthermore, the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya briefly distinguishes them by tetralemma: If a phenomenon has perceptual resistance, does it also have obstructive resistance? One should formulate four positions: the seven mind-elements and the associated phenomena that are part of the dharma-element are the first position; the five objects of form and so on are the second position; the five faculties of the eye and so on are the third position; the non-associated phenomena that are part of the dharma-element are the fourth position. If a phenomenon has perceptual resistance, does it also have cognitive resistance? One should answer according to the subsequent category: whatever has cognitive resistance definitely has perceptual resistance; there are some that have perceptual resistance but not cognitive resistance, namely the five faculties of the eye and so on.