成唯識論演祕 2.218

2.218

此護法釋，傳有五解：一云體增，體有二種，一新；二舊，唯新熏增而非本有，本有勢力不及新故，又非今時思願起故。二云由發惑思合新體，增本有用增，依體增立。三云新舊，悉體增長，依二增立。四云新種用增，其體不增，本有體用皆悉不增，理同前師，尋可知也。五云本亦用增而體不增，然唯本有俱為一釋，如《疏》所明，三師合論總有八釋，皆用增勝，正如《疏》斷。

This is Dharmapāla's explanation. Tradition transmits five interpretations: (1) It says that the substance increases. Substance is of two kinds: first, new; second, old. Only the newly perfumed increases and not the primordial, because the power of the primordial does not match the new, and furthermore it was not generated by present intention and vows. (2) It says that through the intention generating the precepts combining with the new substance, the substance increases, while the primordial increases in efficacy; it is posited on the basis of the increase in substance. (3) It says that both new and old increase in substance, and it is posited on the basis of both increasing. (4) It says that the new seed increases in efficacy while its substance does not increase, and both the substance and efficacy of the primordial do not increase; the rationale is the same as the previous master, which can be understood upon examination. (5) It says that the primordial also increases in efficacy while its substance does not increase. However, the primordial alone forms one explanation, as clarified in the *Commentary*. Combining the three masters' discussions, there are eight explanations in total; in all of them, the increase of efficacy is superior, exactly as the *Commentary* determines.