成唯識論演祕 2.274

2.274

詳曰：《疏》釋為正，故下論云：思謂令心造作為性，於善等品沒心為業，驅役自心令造善等。彼既明文，此何不許造作於心名有所造？不可說彼唯明意業，文無有簡通明思故。復云心令造作善等，豈身、語二無善等耶？令心既是造作心義，餘解紕謬思可知矣。

Examination: The explanation in the Commentary is correct. Therefore, the Treatise below states: Volition takes causing the mind to form and act as its nature; it has the function of directing the mind toward the categories of wholesome and so forth, driving its own mind to produce wholesome and so forth. Since that is clear in the text, why not admit here that forming and acting upon the mind is called 'having that which is formed and acted upon'? One cannot say that that [text] only explains mental action, because the text makes no qualification and universally explains volition. Furthermore, it says that it causes the mind to form and act upon wholesome and so forth; could body and speech lack wholesome and so forth? Since 'causing the mind' means forming and acting upon the mind, other explanations are flawed, as can be understood upon reflection.