成唯識論演祕 2.296

2.296

有義：《疏》說假實相對因，謂假法之餘乃實法之餘，此非理也。彼宗得等皆是假法之餘，實法攝故，因便不成，故今別說除不相應外餘色、心等，實法不攝故。

One interpretation criticizes this: The Commentary speaks of a reason contrasting nominal and real, saying that what is outside nominal dharmas is what is outside real dharmas—this is unreasonable. In their school, acquisition and so forth are outside nominal dharmas and subsumed under real dharmas, so the reason would be unestablished (asiddha). Therefore, we now explain it differently: excluding non-associated [formations], they are not subsumed under the remaining real dharmas of form, mind, and so on.