成唯識論演祕 2.320

2.320

詳曰：後說為勝，不違唯識，復順下說，變他扶塵正義所說，若變他、器現不成者，云何受用他之扶塵及外器色？又豈所受但種非現，而言種成非現成耶？

Detailed analysis states: The latter explanation is superior. It does not contradict vijñapti-mātra and accords with what is explained below, namely the correct teaching that transforms another's auxiliary sensory matter. If what transforms others and the container is not possessed in actuality, how could one experience another's auxiliary matter and the forms of the external container? Furthermore, could what is experienced be only seeds and not actual states, such that one would say seeds are possessed but actual states are not possessed?