成唯識論演祕 2.332
成唯識論演祕 2.332
- Language
- Classical Chinese
2.332
答：文略故也。或前欲界明離自染名成、不成，例上應爾，故不舉也。
Answer: Because the text is abridged. Alternatively, because the preceding desire realm explained detachment from one's own defilement as possession and non-possession, by analogy the higher stages should be likewise, and thus it is not mentioned.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation