成唯識論演祕 2.469

2.469

問：按《俱舍》云，若生無想有情天中，有法能令心、心所滅名為無想，是實有物能遮未來心、心所法令暫不起，如堰江河；既證無想是實有物，云何得言非謂假實以為喻耶？

Question: According to the Kośa: "If one is born among the non-conceptual sentient beings' heaven, there is a dharma that can cause mind and mental factors to cease, called non-conception; it is a real entity that can obstruct future mind and mental factors, causing them temporarily not to arise, like an embankment on a river." Since this proves that non-conception is a real entity, how can one say that it does not take the nominal and real as an analogy?