成唯識論演祕 2.482

2.482

詳曰：若言明了招彼轉識別報異熟微微招彼總報異熟，無想異熟假故不招，如何聖說無想定因，無想異熟而為果耶？假名為招如《燈》具辨。

I examine this and say: If one says that the lucid [mind] summons that specific maturation of the evolving consciousnesses and the extremely subtle [mind] summons that general maturation, and that the non-conception maturation is metaphorical and therefore not summoned—how could the Noble One say that the non-conception absorption is the cause, and the non-conception maturation is the fruit? That it is metaphorically named 'summoning' is fully explained in the Deng.