成唯識論演祕 2.714

2.714

略有三釋：一云，且如一貪，九品不同，斷此一貪證九無為，無為無品，約所斷說，故名為多。二云：釋外難，外難意云：斷想受等已得擇滅，何故望此復名不動無為等耶？不障此一想受等滅，而能證得擇滅、不動多無為也。三云：舉斷一貪得多無為，證受等斷而立擇滅，亦得不動多無為也。後釋為勝。

There are briefly three explanations: The first says: Take, for example, a single craving having nine distinct grades; cutting off this single craving realizes nine unconditioned [states]. The unconditioned has no grades, but it is spoken of in terms of what is severed, and is therefore called many. The second says: This resolves an outside objection. The intent of the outside objection is: having severed conception, sensation, and so forth, one has already attained cessation through deliberation; why, in reference to this, is it further called the unshakeable unconditioned and so forth? [The answer is:] It does not obstruct the single cessation of conception, sensation, and the like from realizing many unconditioned [states], such as cessation through deliberation and the unshakeable. The third says: Citing the severance of a single craving as attaining many unconditioned states, one realizes the severance of sensation and so forth to establish cessation through deliberation, and also attains many unconditioned states such as the unshakeable. The latter explanation is superior.