成唯識論演祕 2.959

2.959

答：有三說，一云即是自證分收，由假說彼無實體，故順第二釋；一云見收，自證境故，順疏所敘；一云雖依自證而立，亦見分收，自證緣故，順第三釋。

Answer: There are three explanations: 1. It falls under the svasaṃvitti-bhāga, because they are metaphorically designated without a real entity, which conforms to the second explanation. 2. It falls under the darśana-bhāga because it is an object of the svasaṃvitti-bhāga, which conforms to what the Commentary recounts. 3. Although established relying on the svasaṃvitti-bhāga, it also falls under the darśana-bhāga because it is taken as an object by the svasaṃvitti-bhāga, which conforms to the third explanation.