成唯識論演祕 2.968

2.968

答：二解，一云許緣無失，此釋不正；一云不緣，但說見分親所緣者，皆名相分；不言諸相皆見所緣。

Answer: There are two explanations: One says that conceding it takes them as an object incurs no fault, but this explanation is incorrect. The other says it does not take them as an object; it is merely that whatever is directly cognized by the darśana-bhāga is termed a nimitta-bhāga, but it is not said that all nimittas are cognized by the darśana-bhāga.