成唯識論演祕 3.13

3.13

問：論云「謂與現行果法」，簡諸現識不名種訖。論更何用下之現字，何煩疏說云顯現簡耶？

Question: The treatise says, 'It means [being present] together with an active fruitional dharma,' which has already completed the exclusion of all active consciousnesses from being called seeds. What further need does the treatise have for the subsequent word 'present (or manifest)'? Why does the Commentary trouble itself to say that 'manifest' excludes it?