成唯識論演祕 3.228

3.228

詳曰：雖所帶相計屬能緣，然說此相似所緣故。所緣即相、所緣之相，名所緣相。不同正量，此似亦無。由斯諸德，義亦何爽。

Examination: Although the aspect that is borne is imputed to belong to that which is capable of cognizing, nevertheless it is said that this aspect resembles that which is cognized. That which is cognized is itself the aspect, or it is the aspect of that which is cognized, hence it is called the aspect of the cognized. Unlike the Sammatīyas, where even this resemblance is absent. Because of this, how could the meaning of the various venerable masters be flawed?