成唯識論演祕 3.285

3.285

有義：但初句收，多自受用，然亦有他受用義故。又如扶塵，唯在自身，由有少分為他用義，尚名為共，如何田等翻名不共？

There is an opinion: It is subsumed only under the first phrase; it is mostly enjoyed by oneself, yet it also has the sense of being enjoyed by others. Furthermore, just as the supporting physical matter exists only in one's own body, yet because a small part of it can be used by others, it is still called "shared"; how could fields and the like conversely be called "unshared"?