成唯識論演祕 3.476

3.476

詳曰：彼既許愛依思分立，豈非喻有所立不成？應如論言，是實非假，即無其失。雖思分位，然得名實。

Detailed analysis: Since the opponent accepts that craving is designated as a portion of volition, would this not mean that the example lacks the property to be proved (sādhya-vikala)? If it were stated as in the Treatise—'is real and not conventional'—there would be no such fault. Although it is a state of volition, it can still be called real.